July 28, 2010

New York Judge Cracking Down on Peachtree Financial

On May 26th, 2010 Judge Norma Ruiz denied a request for court approval to transfer future structured settlement payment rights to Settlement Funding of New York, LLC (Peachtree Financial). The opinion, seen here, is a direct response to the “cash now” advertising of this company. It’s good to see a judge take the time to enforce the Structured Settlement Protection Act as noted by this author.

Read the rest of this post...

February 21, 2010

The Structured Settlement Factoring Exchange

In this video, Andrew Cravenho, President of the Settlement Quotes, LLC Structured Settlement Factoring Exchange is interviewed by John Darer of the Legal Broadcast Network. Viewers can learn how a Structured Settlement Factoring Exchange is a viable option to use when selling structured settlement payment rights.

Read the rest of this post...

Filed under: Education,Factoring,News,Structured Settlements 4 Real — Author- James Grace

November 9, 2009

The Servicing of Structured Settlement Payments

What is the servicing of structured settlement payments?

The servicing of structured settlement payments occurs when an annuitant enters into a structured settlement factoring agreement in which the annuitant chooses to split one or more payments and the factoring company becomes the payee of the entire payment. Once the factoring company receives the entire payment from the insurance company, they keep their agreed upon amount and pay the annuitant their portion.

Read the rest of this post...

February 24, 2009

Structured Settlement Factoring Transactions Not Being Paid

Settlement Quotes has received several inquiries regarding structured settlement factoring companies delaying their obligation to pay annuitants.

Here are a few of the blog comments that Settlement Quotes has received in the past few months:

Read the rest of this post...

Filed under: Factoring,JG Wentworth,Senecaone,Stone Street Capital — Author- Andrew Cravenho

October 16, 2008

Questions About IRC 5891 and the 40% Excise Tax

The following two questions were asked by John Darer of Structured Settlements 4 Real:

  1. Can a structured settlement recipient choose to forgo getting Court approval? If so, what are the consequences?
  2. How does the factoring company “factor in” the 40% excise penalty (set forth in IRC 5891) in the factoring quote to the structured settlement recipient?

The answer to this is quite simple. An annuitant cannot forgo the court approval process in a structured settlement factoring transaction. Here is why:

Read the rest of this post...

September 14, 2008

What Happens If Your Annuity Policy Includes Anti-Assignment Language?

Many annuity policies and settlement agreements usually include anti-assignment or anti-sale language. Even though this language is included within your settlement documents, you are still able to sell your future structured settlement payments!

Here is an example of the language that may be contained inside your annuity policy or settlement agreement:

Read the rest of this post...

Filed under: Annuity,Education,Factoring,Structured Settlement — Author- Andrew Cravenho

September 5, 2008

Examination of a Structured Settlement Factoring Case

John Darer of Structured Settlements 4 Real published a disturbing article yesterday afternoon about an individual interested in selling the rights to a structured settlement with the following details:

  • Annuity set up in 1983
  • The caller stated that this money would be used for investment purposes, but would not go into detail.
  • The annuitant is disabled and suffers from the incident 25 years ago.
  • Annuitant is a resident of California
  • Caller was not the annuitant or financial consultant

Read the rest of this post...

August 2, 2008

Is Selling A Structured Settlement A Wise Investment?

Structured settlement factoring is designed to provide liquidity in case of a financial emergency and in most cases should not be used to start an investment fund. Not only are structured settlements tax free, but they are also guaranteed payments from well rated insurance companies.

There are many reasons to sell a structured settlement including:

  • college education
  • medical expenses
  • bills
  • starting a business
  • buying a home
  • paying off a mortgage

It is important to take into account the welfare and well being of any dependents that may be affected by the overall outcome of a factoring transaction. Cashing out a structured settlement eliminates the tax-free guaranteed payment stream that you and your family may receive on a monthly, annual, or semi-annual basis.

Read the rest of this post...

Filed under: Education,Factoring,Structured Settlement — Author- James Grace

July 16, 2008

When Can A High Discount Rate Be Acceptable?

Settlement Quotes would like to correct a myth about the pricing of structured settlement factoring transactions that we may in fact have created. Settlement Quotes prides itself on our low discount rates that we supply to our clients who are selling the rights to their structured settlement payments. In the past we have discussed rates in the range of 8-10%, but can these rates translate to every factoring transaction that comes through the door? The answer is no.

Read the rest of this post...

Filed under: Education,Factoring — Author- Andrew Cravenho

June 23, 2008

What Is The Difference Between Guaranteed and NON-Guaranteed Payments?

Guaranteed payments are payments that will be made for a guaranteed period of time to either the annuitant or to a beneficiary. Non-guaranteed payments or life contingent payments are payed out for a period of time that is dependent upon the annuitants vital status. In other words if the annuitant dies, so do the payments.

How does this effect a structured settlement factoring transaction?

Structured settlement factoring transactions are priced using many variables to determine the overall risk involved in the transaction (i.e. Insurance company rating–A- AAA, length of payment stream, and guaranteed vs. non-guaranteed payments). If a structured settlement factoring company purchases a life contingent payment stream and the annuitant dies a year later, the factoring company will never receive any money.

Life PolicyLife contingent payment streams are not impossible to accomplish, but are more expensive. Depending upon the annuitants age, health, driving record, medications, and other information a life insurance policy can be purchased with the factoring company as the beneficiary. The purpose of the life insurance policy is to ensure the factoring company that they will either receive all the life contingent payments that were originally purchased, or upon death of the annuitant, the factoring company will receive a payout from the life insurance policy.

Not only are non-guaranteed payments more expensive to sell, but the transactions take much longer to fund as well. If you would like more information on non-guaranteed payments vs. guaranteed payments please comment.

Filed under: Annuity,Education,Factoring — Author- Andrew Cravenho
Newer Posts »